By Staff Writer, John Kling
June 29, 2025
San Bernardino Sheriff Defies Federal Authorities, Sparks National Debate on Law Enforcement Loyalty
Sheriff’s Controversial Stance on Immigration Enforcement Draws Sharp Criticism
In a move that has ignited fierce debate over law enforcement priorities, the San Bernardino County Sheriff’s Department has publicly refused to assist federal immigration authorities, raising concerns about public safety and national security. The decision, outlined in an official statement, places the department at odds with federal law enforcement and aligns it with sanctuary policies that critics argue undermine the rule of law.
Sheriff Chad Bianco in Riverside County is the complete opposite where he enforces the laws of the land as it relates to FEDERAL LAWS which supercede state laws. Here is the federal law that supercedes state law click here.
California SB 54:
8 USC § 1373 – This federal law states: “Notwithstanding any other provision of Federal, State, or local law, a Federal, State, or local government entity or official may not prohibit, or in any way restrict, any government entity or official from sending to, or receiving from, the Immigration and Naturalization Service information regarding the citizenship or immigration status, lawful or unlawful, of any individual” Know Your Rights: Local Law Enforcement and Immigration Under the California Values Act (SB 54) | ACLU of Northern CA
Under the Supremacy Clause, federal law takes precedence over any conflicting state law. Bill Text – SB-54 Law enforcement: sharing data. Both the Constitution and federal law supersede state laws. The California Values Act – SB 54 (de León) – California Immigrant Policy Center
Since 8 USC § 1373 explicitly prohibits state and local governments from restricting communication about immigration status with federal agencies, and SB 54 restricts such cooperation, the federal law supersedes the state law where they conflict.
Sheriff Shannon D. Dicus defended the stance, claiming local resources should not be used to enforce federal immigration laws. But opponents, including President Donald J. Trump, argue that this refusal weakens border security and allows criminal elements to exploit jurisdictional loopholes. Sheriff Dicus when sworn in as he raised his right hand either swore or affirmed to uphold the U.S. Constitution. He does not have the authority to not assist federal authorties when called upon where he is directed by federal authorties. It is actually embarassing if you think about it, why would a Sheriff not want to enforce the law?
A Dangerous Precedent for Public Safety
The sheriff’s decision comes amid escalating concerns over illegal immigration and its impact on local communities. Federal officials warn that non-cooperation policies hinder efforts to deport violent criminals and drug traffickers, putting American citizens at risk.
“When local law enforcement refuses to work with ICE and Border Patrol, they are effectively shielding dangerous individuals from justice,” said a Department of Homeland Security spokesperson. “This isn’t about politics—it’s about keeping our streets safe.”
Supporters of the sheriff’s policy argue that immigrant communities are more likely to report crimes if they don’t fear deportation. However, critics counter that selective enforcement creates a two-tiered justice system, where federal laws are ignored at the local level.
Trump Weighs In: “Law Enforcement Must Uphold ALL Laws”
President Trump, a vocal advocate for strong border security, condemned the sheriff’s stance, urging all law enforcement agencies to cooperate fully with federal authorities.
“We cannot have cities and counties picking and choosing which laws they enforce,” Trump said in a recent statement. “If local officials won’t do their jobs, we need new leadership that will.”
His remarks echo growing frustration among conservative leaders, who argue that sanctuary policies encourage illegal immigration and strain public resources.
MagaDailyNews.com
Morals ● Action ● God ● America
📰 #1 Source for Pro-Christian Conservative News, Conservative Analysis & Breaking Updates
✅ Truth Over Narrative | ✅ Patriot-Powered Journalism
✅ Exclusive Reports | ✅ Deep Dives on America’s Future
In God We Trust
What’s Next for San Bernardino?
The sheriff’s refusal to assist federal agents could have legal and financial repercussions. The Corrupt Biden administration has largely avoided withholding funds from sanctuary jurisdictions, but now that Trump returns to the White House in 2024, things have changed and he brings in renewed enforcement of immigration laws.
Residents are divided. Some praise the sheriff for “protecting families,” while others fear the policy will attract more illegal border crossers to the region.
Learn about how to be a citizen click here.
Your Voice Matters
Do you believe local sheriffs should assist federal immigration enforcement? Share your thoughts with us at Press@MagaDailyNews.com. For further updates on this developing story, contact info@MagaDailyNews.com.
The debate over sanctuary policies continues to rage, with legal experts predicting future court battles over state vs. federal authority.
Recent statistics show a surge in illegal border crossings, adding urgency to the discussion.
Stay informed. Stay engaged. The fight for law and order is far from over. Conservative Christains are watching Sheriff Discus’s decision making very closely.
